Battle for Middle Earth
Excellent graphics and sound, great use of the franchise.
Spotty AI, balance issues.
Posted Jul 16, 2005 - This is a tricky one. Battle for Middle Earth isn't really a well balanced RTS, and yet... I still have more fun playing it than other games. True, I'm a big Lord of the Rings fan/geek and watching a troll pick up a tree and smack a bunch of Gondor infantry away gets me all tingly, but it still seems to have a high fun factor. The game looks and sounds great, and the units look like they were all torn from the movie, and the sound of battle is very nicely done. Apart from that, there are some flaws. Namely, the balance. Heroes (Mostly for Rohan, who get the lion's share of the heroes) are insanely powerful if they level up a bit. To the point where you can practically play with just your heroes and leave the armies at home. Also, the fire arrows upgrade for archers lets them take down most anything easily. Also, the campaign (And game itself) aren't based on "Realism" to the LotR universe. Namely, if you're playing the good campaign, you use Gandalf and defeat the balrog. Plus Gandalf has moves like shooting bolts of lightning or some sort of force push abilitiy. If you can overlook those, you're set. I'd say add another two stars if you're a big fan of Lord of the Rings. Otherwise, I would suggest mostly ignoring it as it isn't a very special RTS game by itself.
71% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful , unhelpful, or inappropriate?





Rated 
