|
|
|
Virtual PC 6.1 Mac (Full Product)
88.9%
Helpful
tatsuk - (June 28, 2004) I have just recently started using version 6.1. Previously, I had been using version 5 for a while. It feels that it is slightly faster than the previous version. It is pretty stable, and have not had any problems so far. Installation was a breeze, just drag and drop. I like the fact that applications you are running on Virtual PC shows in the Dock of your Mac. It feels great to be able to show off your peers that a Mac can run Windows applications.
Product: Virtual PC 6.1 Mac (Full Product)
Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger (Full Product)
83.7%
Helpful
crpcookie - (May 03, 2005) WINDOWS definately still is the bset choice for hardcore gamers. Hard to find good&new games that is compatible for MAC & Linux. MAC is a great OS overall. But not recommended for gamers. The search feature is really really advance. Overall, a neat/nice improvement over the last MAC-OS.
Product: Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger (Full Product)
Virtual PC 6.1 Mac (Full Product)
79.2%
Helpful
gooru - (October 18, 2003) I have been using Virtual PC for several years now and have absolutely loved it. It has saved my butt in many instances when I am not near a Windows machine on which I can run Windows-only software. I even used to use it with Xilinx Foundation to do digital circuit design, and it was fast enough to do that on an iBook 2001. Now, I am running Virtual PC 6.1 on a PowerBook G4 1.25 GHz. The installation was extremely simple and only involved dragging over the application from the CD. I then installed Windows 2000 Professional Service Pack 4. This, too, was very brainless. Virtual PC runs you through all of the steps necessary to install whatever OS you want. The default settings are enough f
Product: Virtual PC 6.1 Mac (Full Product)
Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard (5 Users, Upgrade)
augereau - (10/30/2009) The finder running at 64 bit crashed with applications still running at 32 bit (ie Grammarian) apple must provide developer with code to do rapid conversion of their apps; for now best to wait after 10.6.1 or stick with 10.5.6.
MAC OS X Server v10.6 Snow Leopard Upgrade
lcoclough - (10/20/2009) Aside from the fact that i can no longer use Aperture 1.56 I am pleased with Snow Leopard. Any suggestions other than buying the 2.0 upgrade which is another $100 are certainly welcome? I am using Snow Leopard on my MacBook Pro and want to upgrade my OS X Server to Snow Leopard...Is there an upgrade or just the full product edition for OS X Server??
Cloudmanii - (09/01/2009) I have already gone back to Leopard after trying Snow Leopard for a few days. I see no value in using it and since some of my programs became sluggish or quit working altogether, I decided I liked the old program better.