The reason I purchased this device was to replace ...
3-in-1 device, beautiful design, easy web management.
Lack of hardware specification, weak processor and small memory, so so speed compare to Effecient Speedstream and Zoom DSL modems, OK firewall, worst technical support I've ever experienced.
Posted Jan 24, 2005 - The reason I purchased this device was to replace my out dated Ugate router and an old Alcatel DSL modem when I upgraded my SBC DSL to the 3 Mbp / 384K Pro package. Before I purchase this item, I tried to find out some detail hardware spec from Netgear, unfortunately, you have to be a Netgear product owner to access technical support including information after you register. So I decided to buy one and try it, well, I made a big mistake by doing so. After I installed it, I found that this modem/router is about 110K to 250K slower than my old Ugate/Alcatel setup, I started to do a research try to find out the hardware spec, but I just couldn’t find any reference on the processor and memory count relate to this modem/router, when I contacted Netgear on-line support and asked for hardware specifications for processor and memory, after 80 days and about 7 e-mails from their overseas support plus 2 trouble tickets requesting information, the answer was to have me call the toll free support number because they can't even find the information internally. When I called the support line, I am told “the information you are looking for is proprietary obligatory”, the exact same words from the e-mail respond. Now I know the good reason why they wouldn’t give the spec info while their competitors do, because this Netgear DG632 might have a weak processor and less memory than their competitors’ products. Because of this experience, I decided not to buy Netgear products, I also advise all my clients be aware of Netgear’s poor support and suggest them to try others products such as Linksys and D-link who are honest in publishing their specs.
100% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful , unhelpful, or inappropriate?





Rated 


