Directv H20 vs HR10-250
OTA Tuner, HD Locals via Satellite, RF Remote
Poor HD & SD Decoding, Slow Guide, HUGE 5 LNB Dish, Runs Hot
Posted Nov 12, 2006 - I had been getting local HD TV via an OTA antenna until this point. When I signed up for Directv I leased an H20 and bought a used HR10-250 (Tivo). Directv installed the H20 and the new 5 LNB dish. Excited to see the new HD locals, I decided to watch a football game. I was immediately disappointed. There was a lot of pixelation around any action and the football field looked more like confetti than grass. In focus and still image detail was good. SD channels were blocky and distorted. In addition the guide was as slow as, if not slower than my 5 year old Directv SD receiver. The guide also required picking a filter before actually viewing the guide. Very annoying. After my card for the HR10-250 showed up, I hooked it up and did a comparison. The guide was definately faster than my H20. The HR10-250 did a much better job of decoding both HD and SD. There was little noticeable pixelation even in the SD channels. To the H20's defense, the OTA tuner was much stronger than the HR10. The H20 did still suffer from the same pixelation problems even with the over the air signal. I spoke with Directv about this and they suggested a problem with the unit. Today I was at a local retailer and noticed the problems described on their showroom model H20. I have a 62" 1080p monitor, and I have to admit to being a video snob. A smaller monitor may not show these problems. I would only recommend this unit to someone who cannot receive HD locals via an antenna.
86% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful , unhelpful, or inappropriate?





Rated 
