Sport Bags - Product Reviews

Stuey83 - (June 20, 2007) This is a great bag. I use a HAWG when I need to haul around a lot of cargo, and a M.U.L.E. for when I want a lighter load. This bag fits comfortably on my back, and breathes a bit. It doesn't breathe perfectly, but some ventilation is better than none. The reservoir holds 100 ounces of water - enough for 3 hours of heavy duty activity, or a day of walking around the city shopping. If you want a very light profile bag that can hold a few items, go for the LOBO. If you want a bag that can hold many items, even textbooks, go for the HAWG. If you want a bag that holds some cargo without being too bulky over uncomfortable, go for the M.U.L.E.

jsmblackburn - (July 23, 2006) I purchased this bag for my 12 year old son in December. I really liked how the bag had the separate bat holder and could hold 6 bats. I also liked the fact that it could be wheeled as he always has a hard time carrying his bag. However, after just 6 months of use the bag began to come apart right around the main zipper compartment. The bag began to fray which turned into a major ripping making this main area unusable. I took it in and had it repaired, this repair lasted just one week and it once again pulled apart and frayed. I would not recommend this bag, it is not worth the money.

fatherwilliam - (May 18, 2005) The bag is made of a light foam, so it maintains it shape, but is still fairly soft. I like this bag, but it turned out to be much smaller than I anticipated. You cannot fit a standard size sheet of paper through the opening (without folding). This means no folders, or files, and unless your laptop is very tiny, I doubt it will fit, so it is difficult to use as a school/work bag. On the other hand its small size does make it light, and very portable. Like most waterproof bags, this has a roll-top enclosure (which is underneath the little foam lid). The roll-top is black, and fairly long, and the mouth of the bag is small, so it is often difficult to see into the bag under normal l

fija - (06/17/2009) This review is for the 2008 model Kelty Redwing Womens 2500 bag. The 2008 Kelty Redwing Women's 2500 backpack adjusts easily to woman's slender body. The back padding has a central channel allowing moisture to evaporate in hot weather. The waist belt can be tucked in or completely removed. The bag is light and easy to carry. However, the nylon material feels too thin. 3.5 stars.

kenn_beck - (10/04/2008) I really like this batpack. It is very stylish, has plenty of room for all your equipment and is reasonably priced. It's also lightweight and not as bulky as comparable backpacks. The one major issue with this backpack is that the sleeves proveided for bat storage don't expand large enough to hold a senior barrell bat. If you are playing ball and using standard barrell bats, this is a great choice. If you are playing "select ball" and use senior barrell bats, you'll be disappointed with this backpack.

rcheung07 - (06/30/2008) Love the bag. I'm going from a Domke user to Crumpler. I would have to say there is an improvement. It's more comfortable on the shoulders with alot of gear and it might be easier to pull gear out faster vs Domke (fx-3). Overall, I will be looking at future Crumpler purchases.